欢迎来到OAJRC平台！

期刊栏目

投稿

审稿

期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据：

当前位置：国际教育学 > 2026年 8卷 (4)期

Open Access Article

International Journal of Education. 2026; 8: (4) ; 10-17 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.ije.20260088.

A study on foreign language majors’ evaluation of ideological and political teaching and the influencing factors
外语专业学生对课程思政教学的评价及其影响因素研究

作者： 张平, 李月娥 *

山东农业大学外国语学院山东泰安

*通讯作者：李月娥,单位：山东农业大学外国语学院山东泰安；

发布时间: 2026-08-13 总浏览量: 42

PDF 全文下载引用本文

摘要

外语专业学生对课程思政教学的评价对于提升外语课程思政教学质量具有重要意义。通过对2715名外语专业本科生进行调查，分析其对外语专业课程思政教学的评价，并采用多元有序Logistic回归模型，深入探究其影响因素。研究表明：学生对教师课程思政教学胜任力、教学方法和教材中课程思政的融入评价较高，而对课程考核中课程思政的融入和整体课程思政教学效果评价较低。学生年级、科研经历、竞赛经历对学生评价有正向影响。因此，应全面提高外语教师课程思政教学胜任力，科学使用多种教学方法，加强教材中思辨意识的培养，重点进行课程考核方式改革，科学、有机融入思政教育，充分发挥学生主体作用，提高学生对外语专业课程思政教学的认同和评价，提升外语课程思政整体教学质量。

关键词： 课程思政；学生评教；外语教学

Abstract

Students’ evaluation of ideological and political (IP) teaching holds immense importance for enhancing the quality of IP education within the realm of foreign language instruction. This study conducted a survey involving 2,715 undergraduate students majoring in foreign languages to delve into their assessments of IP teaching in foreign language courses. A multiple ordered Logistic regression model was employed to identify the influencing factors. The results reveal a dichotomy in students’ evaluations. On the one hand, they highly rate teachers’ competence in IP teaching, the effectiveness of teaching methods, and the integration of IP elements into textbooks. On the other hand, they express relatively low satisfaction with the incorporation of IP teaching in curriculum assessment and the overall impact of IP teaching within the courses. Notably, students’ academic grades, research experience, and participation in academic competitions have a positive and significant influence on their evaluations of IP teaching. Therefore, it is essential to comprehensively enhance the ideological and political teaching competency of foreign language teachers, employ a variety of teaching methods, strengthen the cultivation of critical thinking awareness in teaching materials, prioritize the reform of curriculum assessment methods to integrate ideological and political education, give full play to students’ role to improve their recognition and evaluation of ideological and political teaching, and ultimately elevate the overall quality of ideological and political education in foreign language curricula.

Key words： Curriculum ideological and political teaching; Student evaluation of teaching; Foreign language teaching

参考文献 References

[1] 李蕉,方霁. 课程思政中的“思政”:内核、路径与意蕴 [J]. 思想教育研究, 2021, (11): 108-113.

[2] 文秋芳,常小玲. 中国共产党百年外语教育与中华民族伟大复兴 [J]. 外语教育研究前沿, 2021, 4 (02): 7-19+89.

[3] 肖琼,黄国文. 关于外语课程思政建设的思考 [J]. 中国外语, 2020, 17 (05): 1+10-14.

[4] 赵应吉,董保华. 外语课程思政研究的文献计量可视化分析(2015—2021) [J]. 外国语文, 2022, 38 (06): 129-139.

[5] 陆道坤. 新时代课程思政的研究进展、难点焦点及未来走向 [J]. 新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 43 (03): 43-58.

[6] Eiszler, C. F. College Students' Evaluations of Teaching and Grade Inflation[J]. Research in Higher Education, 2002 (4):483-501.

[7] Spooren, P., Brockx, B. et al. On the validity of student evaluation of teaching: the state of the art[J]. Review of Education Research, 2013,83:598–642.

[8] Hornstein, H. A. Student evaluations of teaching are an inadequate assessment tool for evaluating faculty performance[J]. Cogent Education, 2017, 4: 1304016.

[9] 彭湃,周兰兰. 高等教育教学评价研究的进展与热点追踪——对AEHE期刊2011-2015年发文的分析 [J]. 高等教育研究, 2016, 37 (08): 60-68.

[10] Stufflebeam, D. L., Zhang, G. The CIPP Evaluation Model: How to evaluate for improvement and accountability[M]. Guilford Publications. 2017 .

[11] 杨开城,卢韵. 一种教学评价新思路：用教学过程证明教学自身 [J]. 现代远程教育研究, 2021, 33 (06): 49-54.

[12] 郑兰琴,杨开城. 为什么要研究一致性而不是有效性? [J]. 中国电化教育, 2014, (09): 20-23+33.

[13] 谢世坚,蒙岚. 高校外语课程思政系统性建设的思考 [J/OL]. 社会科学家, 2023, (12): 142-147.

[14] 何莲珍.大学外语课程思政之“道”与“术”[J].中国外语,2022,19(04):1+12-14.

[15] 王俊菊,卢萍. CLIL理念下外语课程思政教学设计:原则与路径 [J]. 外语与外语教学, 2023, (06): 9-19+145.

[16] 闫长红,张敏. CLIL和AAIC融合模式下大学英语课程思政教学研究——以“讲好中国故事”为例 [J]. 陕西理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 43(05): 99-108.

[17] 苗兴伟. 外语课程思政视域下价值引领的实践路径 [J]. 外语与外语教学, 2023, (06): 20-27+145-146.

[18] 马爱林,崔海英,蔡宁. “三进”背景下“大学英语”课程思政建设创新发展路径研究 [J]. 河北科技师范学院学报(社会科学版), 2025, 24(2): 105-109+117.

[19] 王晓军. 高校外语课程思政研究回顾与展望 [J]. 当代外语研究, 2024, (04): 40-51.

[20] 刘婷婷,徐剑,袁辉. 教育生态学视域的外语教师课程思政评价体系构建——基于优质课程思政教案的分析 [J]. 外语界, 2025, (02): 88-96.

[21] 潘海英,袁月. 大学外语课程思政实践探索中的问题分析与改进对策 [J]. 山东外语教学, 2021, 42 (03): 53-62.

[22] 孙有中. 课程思政视角下的高校外语教材设计 [J]. 外语电化教学, 2020, (06): 46-51.

[23] 徐锦芬,刘文波. 国家安全视域下外语教材建设的内涵与路径 [J]. 当代外语研究,2021, (05): 73-79+120+129.

[24] 张文霞,赵华敏,胡杰辉. 大学外语教师课程思政教学能力现状及发展需求研究 [J]. 外语界, 2022, (03): 28-36.

[25] 侯勇,钱锦. 课程思政研究的现状、评价与创新 [J]. 江苏大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 23 (06): 66-76.

[26] 汤苗苗,董美娟. 高校课程思政建设存在的问题及对策 [J]. 学校党建与思想教育, 2020, (22): 54-55+70.

[27] Sttiggins, R. J. Student-Centered Classroom Assessment [M]. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill. 1996.

[28] 刘秉栋,冯蕾. 英语专业课程思政体系建设：现实困境与突围路径 [J]. 外语电化教学, 2022, (04): 23-28+112.

引用本文

张平, 李月娥, 外语专业学生对课程思政教学的评价及其影响因素研究[J]. 国际教育学, 2026; 8: (4) : 10-17.

入驻平台

回到顶部

搜索文章: