期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

International Journal of Education. 2025; 7: (10) ; 100-104 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.ije.20250377.

Research on the optimization of undergraduate teaching quality evaluation system and construction of a smart platform—an empirical analysis based on 51 universities
本科教学质量评价体系优化与智慧平台构建研究——基于51所高校的实证分析

作者: 罗永 *, 黎宇珍

北京理工大学珠海学院 广东珠海

*通讯作者: 罗永,单位:北京理工大学珠海学院 广东珠海;

发布时间: 2025-10-20 总浏览量: 122

摘要

教学质量评价是高等教育高质量发展的核心保障,也是一流人才培养的关键抓手。本研究以境内外51所不同层次、不同学科特色的高校为样本,通过文本分析、比较研究及问卷调查,系统梳理当前高校教学质量评价体系的现状与问题。研究发现,国内高校评价体系存在与培养目标适配性不足、评价主体单一、指标设计不科学、结果反馈与改进机制不健全等突出问题。基于此,本研究构建“督导评价、学生评价、同行评价、教师自评、学生自评”的“五维”教学质量评价体系,设计涵盖工科与文科理论课、实验实践课的综合评价指标体系,并提出基于人工智能技术的智慧评价平台方案,为高校教学质量评价改革提供理论参考与实践路径。

关键词: 高等教育;教学质量评价;五维评价体系;评价指标;智慧评价平台

Abstract

Teaching quality evaluation serves as a cornerstone for the high-quality development of higher education and a key measure for cultivating first-rate talents. This study takes 51 domestic and international higher education institutions of varying levels and disciplinary characteristics as samples. Through text analysis, comparative research, and questionnaire surveys, it systematically examines the current state and problems of teaching quality evaluation systems in universities. The research finds that domestic evaluation systems face various challenges, including insufficient alignment with talent training objectives, a lack of diversity in evaluation participants, unscientific indicator design, and inadequate mechanisms for feedback and improvement. Based on these findings, this study constructs a "Five-Dimensional" teaching quality evaluation system encompassing "supervisory evaluation, student evaluation, peer evaluation, teacher self-evaluation, and student self-evaluation". It designs a comprehensive evaluation indicator system covering theoretical courses and experimental/practical courses in both engineering and liberal arts disciplines. Furthermore, it proposes a smart evaluation platform scheme based on artificial intelligence technology, providing theoretical reference and practical pathways for the reform of teaching quality evaluation in universities.

Key words: Higher education; Teaching quality evaluation; Five-dimensional evaluation system; Evaluation indicators; Smart evaluation platform

参考文献 References

[1] 陈丹卉.美国研究型大学教师教学评价制度变迁研究[D].曲阜师范大学,2024.

[2] 周九诗,鲍建生.美国IQA教学质量评估系统的探索与反思[J].比较教育学报,2021(5):87-99.

[3] 任玉丹.数学课堂教学评估指标体系构建[J]. 教育科学研究,2021(11):33-39.

[4] 范岩,马立平.基于灰色系统理论的高校教学质量评价模型研究[J].大学教育,2019(02):185-188.

[5] 李亚奇,李峰,王涛.新工科视角下高校教师教学质量综合评价体系研究[J].高等工程教育研究,2019(S1):289-291.

[6] 张志莹,吴亮.民族高校教师教学质量绩效评价及其影响因素研究[J].北方民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019(04):72-78.

[7] 洪玫, 孙克金等.面向教学持续改进的评教系统设计与实现[J].中国大学教学,2019(10):80-85.

[8] 陈春莲,唐忠.教师教学评价体系的构建与实施——基于“五维一体”发展性评价的改革思路[J].中国高校科技,2020(10):29-32.

引用本文

罗永, 黎宇珍, 本科教学质量评价体系优化与智慧平台构建研究——基于51所高校的实证分析[J]. 国际教育学, 2025; 7: (10) : 100-104.