摘要
在信息技术快速发展的背景下，英语学习资源日益丰富，然而许多高中生在英语学习尤其是词汇知识掌握方面仍面临诸多挑战。本研究以辽宁省某重点高中高二学生为对象，考察英语学习资源管理策略与词汇知识的关系。结果显示，英语学习资源管理策略与词汇知识呈显著正相关，其中，时间管理策略和努力管理策略与词汇知识的相关性较高；学生最常使用努力管理策略且词汇高、低分组在英语学习资源管理策略使用上存在显著差异，其中学业求助策略差异最为突出。研究认为，合理运用资源管理策略对提升高中生英语词汇知识具有积极作用，为词汇教学提供了新的启示。
关键词： 高中英语；资源管理策略；词汇教学；词汇知识
Abstract
Against the backdrop of rapid advancements in information technology, English learning resources have become increasingly abundant. However, many senior high school students still face significant challenges in English learning, particularly in mastering vocabulary knowledge. This study examines the relationship between English learning resource management strategies and vocabulary knowledge among second-year students at a key senior high school in Liaoning Province, China. The results indicate a significant positive correlation between resource management strategies and vocabulary knowledge, with time management and effort management strategies showing the strongest associations. Effort management strategies were the most frequently employed, and significant differences were observed between high- and low-vocabulary achievers in their use of resource management strategies, particularly in help-seeking strategies. The findings suggest that the effective application of resource management strategies can positively enhance vocabulary acquisition among senior high school students, offering new insights for vocabulary instruction.
Key words： Senior high school English; Resource management strategy; Vocabulary teaching; Vocabulary knowledge
参考文献 References
[1] 教育部,[MOE]. (2020). 普通高中英语课程标准 (2017年版, 2020年修订). 北京: 人民教育出版社.
[2] Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[3] 沈宏[Shen, Hong]. (2008). 高中生英语词汇学习策略的调查与研究(硕士学位论文, 东北师范大学).
[4] 魏恒建[Wei, Hengjian]. (2012). 英语词汇学习策略与英语成绩的关系[J]. 山东师范大学外国语学院学报(基础英语教育), (4), 27–36.
[5] 朱云[Zhu, Yun]. (2010). 高职学生英语词汇学习策略与词汇水平的相关性研究[J]. 宿州教育学院学报, (5), 48–51.
[6] Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and psychological measurement, 53(3), 801-813.
[7] Ghazali Yusri.Value And Resource Management Strategies Among Students Of Arabic As A Third Language Course. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences，2011，29:1635-1644.
[8] 饶妙.[Rao, M]. (2015). 商务英语本科生学习资源管理策略研究. 集美大学学报（教育科学）, 36-38.
[9] 张超.[Zhang, C].(2013).资源管理策略与大学英语成绩的相关性研究(硕士学位论文,华北电力大学).
[10] 张庆文. [Zhang. Q.W]. (2017). 资源管理策略对高中生英语学习成绩的有效性研究[D]. 延安大学.
[11] Qian, D. D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language Learning, 52(3), 513–536.
[12] Nation, I. S. P. & 顾永琦[Gu, Yongqi]. (2019). 外语词汇教学的方法 [M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社.
[13] Nation, I. S. P., & Beglar, D. (2007). A vocabulary size test. The Language Teacher, 31(7), 9–13.
[14] Beglar, D. (2010). A rasch-based validation of the vocabulary size test. Lang. Test. 27, 101–118.
[15] Chamani, F. (2016). The effects of time management training on vocabulary learning efficiency. Journal of Language Education Studies, 12(3), 45–62.
[16] 顾永琦，& 胡光伟.[Gu, Y.Q.&Hu, G.W]. (2003). 词汇学习策略、词汇量与英语成绩的变化 [A]. In 陕西师范大学出版社. 西安: 陕西师范大学出版社.
[17] Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory[M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
[18] Weiner, B. (1988). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-4948-1
[19] Sarason, I. G. (1983). Stress, anxiety, and cognitive interference: Reactions to tests. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 1-14. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.1
[20] Chang, C. H., & Liu, H. J. (2013). Language Learning Strategy Use and Language Learning Motivation of Taiwanese EFL University Students. Electronic journal of foreign language teaching, 10(2).
[21] 文秋芳.[Wen, Q.F]. (2001).英语学习者动机、观念、策略的变化规律与特点. 外语教学与研究, 3.